Common Legal Mistakes of Start-Ups
The list below highlights some of the frequent legal mistakes made by start-ups. Blunders and mistakes are certainly a part of life and starting a business. But, we hope that the advice below will help you avoid a few.
Failing to consider vesting requirements on founder stock.
Does your start-up have more than 1 founder? If so, then the founders should consider imposing vesting requirements on the stock that they will receive.
Vesting is the process by which a founder accrues non-forfeitable rights in the stock over time. A typical founder vesting schedule vests an equal percentage of stock on a monthly basis over 48 months.
In practical terms, vesting protects founders from the risk that a co-founder will prematurely leave with his or her slice of the company. For example, assume that 3 co-founders each receive a 1/3 interest in a company with no vesting restrictions. In this example, a co-founder could leave after 1 month and keep his or her 1/3 interest.
Vesting protects against this unfair result. If the founders had adopted the 48 month vesting schedule noted above, then the departing co-founder would only have been entitled to keep a very small portion of his or her interest in the company.
Failing to consider Federal and state securities laws when offering and selling securities.
Is your start-up trying to raise capital? If so, then you need to be aware of Federal and state securities laws.
Absent an IPO, federal and state securities laws bar a company from offering or selling stock (or other equity or debt interests) unless a registration exemption applies. There is no “family and friends” registration exemption. Civil and criminal penalties may apply if a company sells securities without satisfying a registration exemption.
The bottom line: If you are attempting to sell a security (equity or debt in your company), then consult with a competent attorney to ensure that federal and state securities laws are not violated.
Failing to protect intellectual property
Do you know of any start-up that would say that its brand, business idea, and proprietary software and code are not that important? Probably not.
It is critical that start-ups protect their intellectual property. That protection could take the form of a simple assignment of inventions or a patent, trademark, trade secret, or copyright. Entrepreneurs must recognize the significance of IP protection and consult with competent advisors.
Failing to properly document employment relationships
Has your start-up hired employees? If so, then you should have standard employment documents that clearly define the employment relationship and protects the start-up.
The employment documents should include provisions regarding confidentiality, inventions assignments, and the at-will nature of the employment.
MORE BLOGS FROM NICHOLAS M. OERTEL
- Title III Crowdfunding: What is a Funding Portal?
- SEC Finalizes Long-Awaited Title III Crowdfunding Rules
- Crowdfunding 101
- Hackers Declare War on Health Care and Industry Fights Back
Nicholas focuses his practice in the areas of Michigan non-property tax disputes, business entity selection, corporate transactions, and information technology.View All Posts by Author ›
- Intellectual Property
- Entity Planning
- Electronic Health Records
- Labor Relations
- Personal Publicity Rights
- Fraud & Abuse
- Chapter 11
- Domain Name Registration
- Social Media
- Sales Tax
- Trade Secrets
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- Tax Disputes
- Alerts and Updates
- Estate Planning
- Department of Labor
- IT Contracts
- Legislative Updates
- Cloud Computing
- Entity Selection, Organization & Planning
- Venture Capital/Funding
- Employee Benefits
- Did you Know?
- Digital Assets