BizTech Law Blog Banner

BizTech Law Blog

Part 3 - U.S. Patent Reform: False Marking Claims

false marking claimsThis is the third and final post in a series (Part 1: First-to-File; Part 2: Post Grant Review Proceedings) summarizing the most significant changes created by the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (the "Act").  As you know, the Act was signed into law on September 16th.  Although hyped as a major change in the U.S. Patents system, the Act does not affect many of the fundamental tenants of U.S. Patent law.

This blog post focuses on: (1) new limitations on false marking claims, and (2) USPTO funding and fees.

FALSE MARKING CLAIMS

Effective September 16, 2011, the Act creates new limitations on false marking claims brought under 35 USC § 292.  Before the Act, any person could sue for a penalty of $500 for every instance of false marking.  The Act limits this penalty clause so that only the U.S. Government or a party that can prove competitive injury will be able to bring a false marking suit.  The Act also provides that marking an item with an expired patent number is not a violation of the statute.  This change applies to any case pending on or after the date of enactment.

USPTO FUNDING AND FEES

One of the contested provisions between the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate version of the bill related to the diversion of fees received by the USPTO.  Specifically, the original bill prohibited the diversion of USPTO fees away from the USPTO and into the general fund.  While this provision was deleted from the final version by the House of Representatives, the Act still contains several significant funding provisions which include:

  • Providing the Director of the USPTO with fee and service setting authority;
  • applicant may pay a fee of $4,800 ($2,400 for small entities), which allows the applicant to move up in the line of examinations;
  • A new 15% surcharge on certain fees starting September 26, 2011;
  • Providing certain "micro-entities" with a 70% reduction in fees.

CONCLUSION

This blog post and my previous postings regarding the Act describe several changes created by the Act.  However, the Act does not address the two major problems with current U.S. Patent Law.  These are the long backlog of patent applications and the perceived over-issuance of questionable patents by the USPTO.  Instead, the Act merely tinkers with current law on the margins and increases the authority of the USPTO to administratively review patents after they have been issued.  None of these changes are likely to have a significant effect on the U.S. patent system nor are they likely to decrease the costs of receiving a patent or the cost of infringement litigation.

Please contact me if you have questions regarding the Act.

Authors

Categories

Recent Posts

Jump to Page

Foster Swift Collins & Smith PC Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek